Handheld UV light devices that can kill Covid-19 ‘may soon be as common as mobile phones’ – as scientists say the rays can ‘inactivate most viruses very efficiently’

  • UV radiation can destroy genetic material inside viruses so it can’t survive
  • UV light is being used to disinfect public transport, hospitals and planes
  • But devices used are bulky, expensive and don’t last very long 
  • Scientists are one step closer to creating a device which is hand held  
  • But it’s not clear how this would work considering UV light is dangerous    
  • Here’s how to help people impacted by Covid-19

Handheld UV light devices that can kill Covid-19 may soon be as commonplace as mobile phones, researchers claim.

For years experts have known UV rays can destroy genetic material inside viruses, hampering their ability to survive on surfaces.

Scientists fighting to end the pandemic have yet to uncover any proof that UV light can kill SARS-CoV-2, the virus that cases Covid-19. 

But studies have repeatedly shown that it can be used against other coronaviruses, such as the closely related strain behind SARS.

UV light is already used to disinfect public transport, planes and hospitals, including in the NHS, to control the spread of germs.

Surfaces need to be exposed to extremely high doses to ensure viruses are destroyed  – but the current devices used are bulky and expensive. 

Scientists are now one step closer to making portable gadgets capable of warding off the coronavirus, which has infected at least 6million people worldwide.

A team at Penn State University made a ‘breakthrough’ in the hunt for materials that can successfully emit UV radiation in a compact device. 

However, UV light of this intensity would be dangerous to human skin and eyes, so the feasibility of selling such devices commercially is not currently clear.  

Handheld UV light devices that can kill Covid-19 may soon be as common as mobile phones, scientists claim. Pictured, a UV light sterilization tool (stock)

Pictured: A bus is being disinfected by ultraviolet light on March 4, 2020 in Shanghai, China

The main way viruses can be wiped off surfaces is through chemicals in disinfectant products and UV light – specifically UVC, scientists say.

UVC rays do not reach the earth because they are blocked by the ozone atmosphere, while UVA and UVB are those which tan our skin.

Because UVC rays do not reach Earth, scientists use artificial forms of UVC light to sterilise food, air and water. 

A form called germicidal UV light is used to sterilise hospitals, airplanes, offices, and factories – and demand has soared during the pandemic.

In China, whole buses are being lit up by blue light over night, while robots with UV lamps on top have been ‘cleaning’ rooms in hospitals. 

There is no evidence to say the new coronavirus can be killed by UV light, and it is only being used based on evidence suggesting it may work.

But one study at Columbia University showed it could kill more than 95 per cent of pathogens like the coronavirus. 

UVC wavelengths are short and have a spectrum between 100 nanometres to 280 nanometres. 

According to scientists at Penn State University, UV radiation in the range of 200 to 300 nanometers is optimum for destroying the virus. 

In comparison, UV rays that reach our skin from the sun have much longer wavelengths between 280 and 400 nanometres. Therefore they are weaker at penetrating and killing the virus. 

CAN UV LIGHT CAN KILL THE VIRUS? 

It has long been known that UV light has a sterilizing effect because the radiation damages the genetic material of viruses and their ability to replicate.

Most viruses – such as SARS-CoV-2 – are covered with a thin membrane that is easily broken apart by UV rays. 

Paul Hunter, a professor in medicine at University of East Anglia said: ‘That UV light inactivates SARS-CoV-2 is not surprising. UV inactivates most viruses very efficiently. Indeed UV disinfection is widely used for disinfection of drinking water. 

‘Given the nature of coronaviruses we would expect them to be especially sensitive to disinfection by either hypochlorite (bleach) or UV light.’

Dr Penny Ward, chair of the Education and Standards Committee of the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Medicine at King’s College London said: ‘UV irradiation and high heat are known to kill virus particles on surfaces and coronavirus particles are no exception to this general rule.’

UV radiation is present in sunlight, and scientists say there is a lower risk of catching the coronavirus outdoors than indoors for this reason.

Keith Neal, an emeritus professor in the epidemiology of infectious diseases, University of Nottingham, explained that sunlight damages DNA and RNA in the virus, which would kill it. 

‘How quickly in affects COVID-19 I have not seen any work, but viruses left on surfaces outside will dry out and be damaged by UV light in sunlight,’ he told MailOnline.

The World Health Organization warns that you can catch COVID-19, ‘no matter how sunny or hot the weather is’. 

A Columbia University study published in Scientific Reports two years ago showed UV light can kill more than 95 per cent of pathogens like the coronavirus.

Sunlight contains UVB and UVA rays, which are those that give us a tan, but UVC rays do not reach the earth because they are blocked by the ozone atmosphere.

UVC rays are shorter are more energetic wavelengths of light. They are particularly good at destroying genetic material by disrupting nucleic acids and DNA, leaving the pathogen unable to perform vital cellular functions.

Scientists use artificial forms of UVC light, called germicidal UV light, to sterilise hospitals, airplanes, offices, and factories – and demand has soared during the pandemic.

There hasn’t been any evidence of its sterilising effects on SARS-CoV-2, the new coronavirus that causes Covid-19. But at least studies have shown that it can be used against the closely related SARS coronavirus. 

Other studies have shown various doses work against coronaviruses murine (MHV), berne (coronaviridae) and canine (CCV). 

Conventional germicidal UV light kills microbes but also penetrates the skin, raising the risk of various forms of skin cancer as well as cataracts.

The devices that are capable of emitting extremely high doses of UVC light usually contain a mercury-containing gas discharge lamp. It’s bulky and expensive, however.

In recent years, smaller UV light emitting diodes (LEDs) have been developed which can emit light between 255 to 280 nanometres. The energy conversion of an LED is known to be lower than a mercury lamp, which means it isn’t as strong, and the cost isn’t much better.

An LED is a semiconductor device that emits light when particles that carry an electric current are combined with a semiconductor material.

It’s the same way a smartphone or nail lamp in a salon emits light.

Honing UVC light at the same intensity as a mercury lamp into a small, portable device with an LED is difficult to achieve. The materials used inside the electrode would need to be transparent to UV light, scientists say.

Associate professor Roman Engel-Herbert, materials science, physics and chemistry at Penn State, said: ‘You have to ensure a sufficient UV light dose to kill all the viruses. 

‘This means you need a high-performance UV LED emitting a high intensity of UV light, which is currently limited by the transparent electrode material being used.’

Joseph Roth, doctoral candidate in Materials Science and Engineering at Penn State, added: ‘There is currently no good solution for a UV-transparent electrode.

‘Right now, the current material solution commonly employed for visible light application is used despite it being too absorbing in the UV range.

‘There is simply no good material choice for a UV-transparent conductor material that has been identified.’

The Penn State team, in collaboration with experts from the University of Minnesota, looked at a newly discovered material called strontium niobate.

After obtaining some samples of strontium niobate from Japan, the research team tested the material as a UV transparent conductor and found it had ‘excellent performance’.

Mr Roth said this ‘breakthrough discovery’ potentially offers a solution to deactivate Covid-19 particles.

The next step is to integrate the material into LEDs at a low cost so they can be scaled up for sale.

Mr Roth and Professor Engel-Herbert, who published their findings today in the journal Physics Communications, believe measures like this are necessary during the crisis.

It is not clear how UVC light could safely be used by people in the public considering it is extremely dangerous to both the skin and eyes. 

Although UV rays – including those in sunlight – may work to swipe surfaces of the virus, they pose serious risks, scientists have warned. 

Machines that emit UV light are not operated by people close by – you would have to stand outside a room being scanned by a UV-robot. 

A furious backlash followed US President Donald Trump floating the idea of exposing Covid-19 patients to ‘ultraviolet or just very powerful light’. 

Paul Hunter, a professor in medicine, University of East Anglia, said in response: ‘There is no way currently that UV could be used to irradiate inside the body that would do any good. UV is also toxic to human cells. 

‘Shining UV on people’s skin can cause burns and skin cancer, into people’s eyes it can cause conjunctivitis cataracts and blindness. 

‘Even if we could shine it into people’s lungs it would also likely do immense harm and increase the risk of cancer.’

Dan Arnold, who works for UV Light Technology, a company that provides disinfecting equipment to hospitals, told BBC Future: ‘It can take hours to get sunburn from UVB, but with UVC it takes seconds. 

‘If your eyes are exposed… you know that gritty feeling you get if you look at the sun? It’s like that times 10, just after a few seconds.’

By the time the virus has taken hold inside your body, no amount of UV light on the skin would make a difference anyway.

Scientists also cast doubt on the use of UV rays for reducing virus transmission considering the main way it spreads is from a person coughing or sneezing onto somebody else.   

Source: Read Full Article