Do YOU have a face for leadership? Entrepreneurs like Elon Musk and Richard Branson are more likely to have a symmetrical face and prominent CHEEKBONES, study reveals
- Entrepreneurs more likely to have symmetrical face and prominent cheekbones
- That is the finding of a new study which was led by University of Cyprus experts
- Looked at facial width-to-height ratio; cheekbone prominence; facial symmetry
- But no links found between facial characteristics and entrepreneur performance
Entrepreneurs are always looking for that next big idea to vault their business into the stratosphere.
But just what is it that makes somebody want to start and grow their own company?
It turns out it may be partly associated with a person’s facial features, according to a team of researchers led by the University of Cyprus.
They found that entrepreneurs chasing the prospect of becoming the next Sir Richard Branson or Elon Musk are more likely to have a symmetrical face and prominent cheekbones.
However, although this makes them more likely to become an entrepreneur, it has no bearing on whether they will be a successful one, according to the researchers.
All in the face? Researchers have found that entrepreneurs chasing the prospect of becoming the next Elon Musk (left) or Sir Richard Branson (right) are more likely to have a symmetrical face and prominent cheekbones
The researchers looked at facial landmarks, width-to-height ratio (fWHR), cheekbone prominence and facial symmetry for their study
What your face says about your sex life
Men with long facial features and large eyes, and women with slim faces and small eyes are percieved as more promiscuous, a recent study revealed.
In the study, experts in Australia asked heterosexual men and women about their levels of ‘sociosexuality’ – the willingness to engage in sexual activity outside of a committed relationship, also known as casual sex.
The participants also had their photos taken and shown to other participants of the opposite sex, so they could judge, based on looks alone, if they had an interest in sociosexuality.
Men who were open to casual sex typically had longer faces, higher foreheads, longer noses and larger eyes, the team found.
What’s more, women accurately identified these male facial features as indicators of the guys’ interest in casual sex.
However, men wrongly perceived smaller, more gracile female faces featuring smaller eyes and smaller lips to be an indicator of women’s openness to casual sex.
So while these may be the physical traits men look for when up for a one-night-stand, either consciously or subconsciously, they might not indicate that the woman is up for it.
The team set out to understand whether certain facial features were linked to entreprenuers.
In their study, published in The Leadership Quarterly, the researchers explained: ‘Facial appearance has been associated with leader selection in domains where effective leadership is considered crucial, such as politics, business and the military.
‘Few studies, however, have so far explored associations between facial appearance and entrepreneurship, despite the growing expectation that societies project on entrepreneurs for providing exemplary leadership in activities leading to the creation of disruptive start-ups.’
The researchers used facial analysis tools on a large database of white, male entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs in the US.
They focused on three key facial features – facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR), cheekbone prominence and facial symmetry.
The analysis revealed that men with more prominent cheekbones and a symmetrical face were more likely to be entrepreneurs, while facial width-to-height ratio was not linked.
However, these features did not seem to play a role in their success as an enterpreneur.
The study’s lead author, Dimosthenis Stefanidis, of the University of Cyprus, said: ‘The findings from our research suggest that facial appearance is associated with the emergence of leaders but not with their subsequent business performance.’
The experts said that because their study looked at white male entrepreneurs only, future research should focus on a more diverse group of entrepreneurs, including women, to see if the same results are obtained.
‘Future research could also focus on identifying the social inferences formed by the facial characteristics and how they influence entrepreneurship,’ the authors wrote.
‘In addition, additional research can examine how the interplay between facial characteristics and environmental factors might influence the likelihood of becoming an entrepreneur.’
They added: ‘We encourage future studies to examine perceptions of entrepreneurial behavior that result from fWHR, cheekbone prominence, and facial symmetry, and whether these perceptions can predict the amount of funding that entrepreneurs receive.’
The study comes shortly after research revealed that men with long facial features and large eyes, and women with slim faces and small eyes are percieved as more promiscuous.
In the study, experts in Australia asked heterosexual men and women about their levels of ‘sociosexuality’ – the willingness to engage in sexual activity outside of a committed relationship, also known as casual sex.
The participants also had their photos taken and shown to other participants of the opposite sex, so they could judge, based on looks alone, if they had an interest in sociosexuality.
Men who were open to casual sex typically had longer faces, higher foreheads, longer noses and larger eyes, the team found.
What’s more, women accurately identified these male facial features as indicators of the guys’ interest in casual sex.
However, men wrongly perceived smaller, more gracile female faces featuring smaller eyes and smaller lips to be an indicator of women’s openness to casual sex.
So while these may be the physical traits men look for when up for a one-night-stand, either consciously or subconsciously, they might not indicate that the woman is up for it.
WHAT ARE THE NINE WAYS TO SPOT A LIAR?
The big pause: Lying is quite a complex process for the body and brain to deal with. First your brain produces the truth which it then has to suppress before inventing the lie and the performance of that lie.
This often leads to a longer pause than normal before answering, plus a verbal stalling technique like ‘Why do you ask that?’ rather than a direct and open response.
The eye dart: Humans have more eye expressions than any other animal and our eyes can give away if we’re trying to hide something.
When we look up to our left to think we’re often accessing recalled memory, but when our eyes roll up to our right we can be thinking more creatively. Also, the guilt of a lie often makes people use an eye contact cut-off gesture, such as looking down or away.
The lost breath: Bending the truth causes an instant stress response in most people, meaning the fight or flight mechanisms are activated.
The mouth dries, the body sweats more, the pulse rate quickens and the rhythm of the breathing changes to shorter, shallower breaths that can often be both seen and heard.
Overcompensating: A liar will often over-perform, both speaking and gesticulating too much in a bid to be more convincing. These over the top body language rituals can involve too much eye contact (often without blinking!) and over-emphatic gesticulation.
The more someone gesticulates, the more likely it is they might be fibbing (stock image)
The poker face: Although some people prefer to employ the poker face, many assume less is more and almost shut down in terms of movement and eye contact when they’re being economical with the truth.
The face hide: When someone tells a lie they often suffer a strong desire to hide their face from their audience. This can lead to a partial cut-off gesture like the well-know nose touch or mouth-cover.
Self-comfort touches: The stress and discomfort of lying often produces gestures that are aimed at comforting the liar, such as rocking, hair-stroking or twiddling or playing with wedding rings. We all tend to use self-comfort gestures but this will increase dramatically when someone is fibbing.
Micro-gestures: These are very small gestures or facial expressions that can flash across the face so quickly they are difficult to see. Experts will often use filmed footage that is then slowed down to pick up on the true body language response emerging in the middle of the performed lie.
The best time to spot these in real life is to look for the facial expression that occurs after the liar has finished speaking. The mouth might skew or the eyes roll in an instant give-away.
Heckling hands: The hardest body parts to act with are the hands or feet and liars often struggle to keep them on-message while they lie.
When the gestures and the words are at odds it’s called incongruent gesticulation and it’s often the hands or feet that are telling the truth.
Source: Read Full Article
