Congressman Tim Burchett calls Pentagon's UFO report 'bogus'
We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Among a litany of groundbreaking requirements, Congress is set to mandate the establishment of rapid UFO response teams, initiate a scientific study of objects that “exceed the known state of the art in science or technology” and require investigations of health-related effects associated with UFO encounters. Perhaps most importantly, following seven decades of Cold War-induced secrecy, denial and obfuscation, the 2022 National Defense Authorization Act will mandate unprecedented government transparency on UFOs.
The US government has said it has no explanation for dozens of unidentified flying objects seen by military pilots.
A Pentagon report released in June says of 144 reports made about the phenomena since 2004, all but one remains unexplained.
It does not rule out the possibility that the objects are extra-terrestrial.
Congress demanded the report after the US military reported numerous instances of objects seen moving erratically in the sky.
The Pentagon then established the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force last August to look into the reports.
The group’s job was to “detect, analyse and catalogue” these events, as well as to “gain insight” into the “nature and origins” of UFOs, the Pentagon said.
Robust bipartisan support for the bill’s expansive provisions amounts to a stark rebuke of years of official ineptitude and inaction on UFOs.
Moreover, congressional assertiveness is reviving the “one percent” doctrine, which holds that if there is even a slight chance that a particular threat is real, the government must act as if it is a certainty.
Formulated by the George W. Bush administration after the 9/11 attacks, the “one percent” doctrine initially resulted in catastrophe.
The 2003 Iraq War, premised upon the disingenuous notion that Iraq’s secular dictator might collaborate with jihadists to attack the United States, led to hundreds of thousands of unnecessary deaths, cost trillions in taxpayer dollars and sparked the rise of the Islamic State.
But the legislative crusade to force the government to take the UFO phenomenon seriously is destined to clash with deeply ingrained bureaucratic and ideological resistance.
Luis Elizondo, the former head of an informal Pentagon-led effort to investigate US military encounters with UFOs, highlighted this dynamic by pointing me to recent comments from a top national security official.
Beyond national security concerns, the physics-defying capabilities reported by military personnel and recorded by multiple sensor platforms demand urgent scientific attention.
DON’T MISS:
Arthur Labinjo-Hughes’ evil stepmother in isolation for own protection [REPORT]
Russia warns passenger planes at risk of ‘dangerous incident’ [REVEAL]
Boris could tell Brits to ‘stay where you are’ after 25th [INSIGHT]
Astronomer J. Allen Hynek stated in congressional testimony over a half-century ago, even “if the sole purpose of such a study [of UFOs] is to satisfy human curiosity, to probe the unknown and to provide intellectual adventure, then it is in line with what science has always stood for.”
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who pressed for the UFO study to be done, is also vice-chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.
Following the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena or UAP report released in June, Rubio said in a statement: “For years, the men and women we trust to defend our country reported encounters with unidentified aircraft that had superior capabilities, and for years their concerns were often ignored and ridiculed.”
Rubio said that the report “is an important first step in cataloguing these incidents, but it is just a first step.
The Defence Department and intelligence community have a lot of work to do before we can actually understand whether these aerial threats present a serious national security concern.”
Source: Read Full Article
