Breastfeeding mother, 36, says she will have to take her eight-week-old baby to court as officials rule that having a baby is no excuse to avoid jury duty
- Zoe Stacey was asked to do jury service at Winchester Crown Court next month
- She tried to defer after giving birth but her plea for exemption was denied
- The full-time mother said she will have to bring baby William into the jury box
A breastfeeding mother says she will have to take her eight-week-old baby to court after her request to defer jury duty was denied.
Zoe Stacey, 36, was told giving birth to baby William just two months ago is not an excuse not to sit on a jury.
She attempted to appeal and change the dates but was told she will be expected to turn up to Winchester Crown Court next month.
Zoe Stacey says she will have to take her eight-week-old baby (pictured together) to court after her request to defer jury duty was denied
The full-time mother said she is still breastfeeding and will have no choice but to bring William into the jury box.
She said she is unwilling to leave him at home for a long time at such a young age.
The mother-of-two from Fair Oak, Hampshire, who suffered a number of illnesses after birth, said: ‘I breastfed my first son until well after his first birthday and I plan to do the same with William.
‘Having gone through everything I did on top of breastfeeding, obviously people who choose to feed also have the right to be granted parental leave.
‘Even just being sleep deprived, I wouldn’t want people giving a judgment on me in a trial as it’s really difficult to give your focus to anything in that first year.
‘I had to give them several dates within that time frame where I would be prepared to serve for ten days.’
The full-time mother (pictured with husband Peter and children Thomas and William) said she is still breastfeeding and will have no choice but to bring William into the jury box
She added: ‘I don’t want to leave my child for ten days, a night is the longest I left my other son.
‘We recently relocated from Hertfordshire to Hampshire and I don’t have a massive support system to rely on.
‘I’m just a bit surprised they are pushing it so much, I really thought that being a new parent and breastfeeding as well would be grounds for exemption.
‘I can’t believe I have to fight for it. I thought there’d be more common sense and compassion.
‘Not only is breastfeeding an issue, I have a child and another three-and-a-half year old child, there’s also the lockdown and the situation with childcare.’
Just one week after his birth on February 15, Zoe and William contracted neonatal mastitis and had to go to hospital for three courses of antibiotics.
The mother-of-two from Fair Oak, Hampshire, suffered a number of illnesses after her second birth
William then became tongue-tie and suffered thrush from the antibiotics, and Zoe’s husband Peter Stacey, 36, had to look after their other young son Thomas, three.
She received a letter on April 2 summoning her for jury service on May 24, and she immediately went online to apply for exemption.
Her request was rejected, and she was initially offered the opportunity to defer her jury service to another date.
But ten minutes, she got an email confirming her court date in May at Winchester Crown Court.
She said: ‘There’s no consideration. It feels like a bit of an automated “computer says no”, rather than reading what I put they just rejected them.’
She searched online and found that plenty of other new mothers had had a similar response to her when requesting exemption from jury service.
She said: ‘It’s not consistent, a lot of people have been excused and some people haven’t even been deferred.
She searched online and found that plenty of other new mothers had had a similar response to her when requesting exemption from jury service
‘What I’d really like to push for is like in Scotland where a breastfeeding woman who requests an excusal shouldn’t be refused.
‘They need a policy down here. It seems to depend on who reads your email. It’s very hit and miss.’
Zoe appealed the decision again on Saturday but if this fails she plans to take baby William into the jury box with her and hopes the judge will see sense.
The maximum penalty for not attending jury service is £1,000 which must be paid within 28 days, otherwise 14 days’ imprisonment is imposed by default.
Zoe said: ‘When I’m feeding Will in the middle of the night and I’m sleep deprived it’s going through my mind.
‘I understand it’s a civic duty and I think it’s really important, I just don’t think it’s realistic to request parents to do it in the first year, especially during the pandemic.
‘We have been isolated, no socialising, not a lot of support around and it’s been very difficult compared to my first child where we had other mums we were with and had groups to go to.
‘It’s been stressful for a lot of people with what’s been going on. You throw in a child and sleepless nights and being asked to serve on a jury when it’s not a nice time.’
The Jury Central Summoning Bureau, part of the UK government, has been approached for comment.
Source: Read Full Article
