New York: The nondescript, six-storey office building on a busy street in New York’s Chinatown lists several mundane businesses on its lobby directory, including an engineering company, an acupuncturist and an accounting firm.
A more remarkable enterprise, on the third floor, is unlisted: a Chinese outpost suspected of conducting police operations without jurisdiction or diplomatic approval – one of more than 100 such outfits around the world that are unnerving diplomats and intelligence agents.
FBI counter-intelligence agents searched the building last year as part of a criminal investigation being conducted with the US attorney’s office in Brooklyn, according to people with knowledge of the inquiry. The search represents an escalation in a global dispute over China’s efforts to police its diaspora far beyond its borders. Irish, Canadian and Dutch officials have called for China to shut down police operations in their countries. The FBI raid is the first known example of authorities seizing materials from one of the outposts.
A glass building, centre, on East Broadway in New York’s Chinatown, where a Chinese outpost is suspected of conducting police operations without jurisdiction or diplomatic approval.Credit:Hilary Swift/The New York Times
Those who discussed the FBI search did so on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to discuss the matter. The Chinese embassy in Washington this week played down the role of the outposts, saying they were staffed by volunteers who help Chinese nationals perform routine tasks like renewing their driver’s licences back home.
But Chinese state news media reports reviewed by The New York Times cite police and local Chinese officials by name describing the operations very differently. They tout the effectiveness of the offices, which are frequently called overseas police service centres. Some reports describe the Chinese outposts “collecting intelligence” and solving crimes abroad without collaborating with local officials. The public statements leave it murky who exactly is running the offices. Sometimes they are referred to as volunteers; other times as staff members or, in at least one case, the director.
Some of those online articles have been deleted recently as Western officials and human rights groups have called attention to the police offices.
Western officials see the outposts as part of Beijing’s larger drive to keep tabs on Chinese nationals abroad, including dissidents. The most notorious such effort is known as Operation Fox Hunt, in which Chinese officials hunt down fugitives abroad and pressure them to return home.
At least four Chinese localities – Fuzhou, Qingtian, Nantong and Wenzhou – have set up dozens of police outposts, according to state media accounts and public statements published in China. They identify sites in Japan, Italy, France, Britain, Germany, Hungary, the Czech Republic and other nations.
“It’s extremely worrying from the human rights perspective. We’re essentially allowing the Chinese diaspora to be controlled by the PRC rather than subject to our national laws,” said Igor Merheim-Eyre, an adviser to a Slovakian member of the European Parliament, using the acronym for the People’s Republic of China. “That obviously has a huge impact — not only for our relations with the Chinese diaspora across Europe, but also has huge implications for national sovereignty.”
The Chinese Embassy in Washington.Credit:Justin Gellerson/The New York Times
The New York outpost, which was set up by the city of Fuzhou, is based in the offices of a Chinese community organisation, the America Changle Association NY, according to the state-run China Youth Daily, which last year published a document listing various police outposts. Changle is a district in the city of Fuzhou. The article has since been deleted. Other addresses of Chinese police outposts match locations of private businesses, including Chinese restaurants and commercial associations. The Chinese embassy in Washington described the spaces as “provided by local overseas Chinese communities who would like to be helpful”.
America Changle is headed by Lu Jianshun, known as Jimmy Lu, a donor to Mayor Eric Adams of New York. It is unclear whether he is a focus of the FBI’s investigation. A spokesperson for Adams said the mayor does not know him.
Lu, asked during a brief phone conversation about the FBI search, said he would call back but did not. He did not respond to telephone and text messages seeking comment. Spokesmen for the FBI and the US attorney’s office in Brooklyn declined to comment, but FBI Director Christopher Wray told lawmakers in November that he was aware of and concerned by the outposts, which he called police stations.
The embassy in Washington said the sites were not police stations. “They are not police personnel from China,” said its spokesperson, Liu Pengyu. “There is no need to make people nervous about this.”
It is not automatically inappropriate for police officers to work overseas. The FBI, for example, posts agents abroad. But they typically declare themselves to the foreign government and work out of American embassies. If they perform law enforcement duties, it is with the permission of local authorities. China has made similar arrangements for joint patrols in places like Italy, a popular destination for Chinese tourists.
That makes the off-the-books operations all the more curious.
China’s Foreign Ministry has said little in response to the criticism, but back in China, police departments have trumpeted their reach and information-gathering powers both in official statements and in the state news media.
The state-run China News Service said Qingtian’s overseas police centres gathered information on public opinion and the sentiment of Chinese people living abroad.
And an article posted by a Communist Party body in Jiangsu province said that Nantong City Overseas Police Linkage Service Centres had helped capture and persuade more than 80 criminal suspects to return to China since February 2016. The human rights group Safeguard Defenders said in a report late last year that the police stations carried out similar operations in Serbia, Spain and France.
It is not clear what the FBI was investigating during its search, but it comes amid a broader Justice Department effort to rein in Fox Hunt. In October, prosecutors in Brooklyn — the same office that searched the New York office — charged seven Chinese nationals with harassing a U.S. resident and his son, pressuring the man to return to China to face criminal charges.
“It’s outrageous that China thinks it can come to our shores, conduct illegal operations and bend people here in the United States to their will,” Wray said in 2020, after authorities charged eight others with being part of Fox Hunt.
The Chinese government has also surveilled and pressured ethnic minorities abroad, including Uyghurs and Tibetans, as well as their families. Human rights groups and government officials fear that the outposts could be bases for these kinds of operations.
Current and former law enforcement officials in New York say that the Chinatown outpost, like others elsewhere in the United States, dates to the middle of the past decade. Police officials in at least one Chinese province tried then to arrange for their officers to train with the New York Police Department and other departments in cities that are home to large Chinese communities, law enforcement officials said.
The Chinese officials wanted the NYPD to sign a memorandum of understanding to outline the training program and make it official. But senior commanders and New York FBI officials had serious concerns. They feared that the training program could legitimise the presence of Chinese officers and potentially make the NYPD an unwitting partner in a campaign of surveillance and harassment, officials said.
“The Chinese government wants to have more influence and to extend their transnational policing,” said Chen Yen-ting, a Taiwan-based researcher who worked on the Safeguard Defenders report. “It’s a long-arm power to show their own citizens inside China that their government is so strong. We have the power to reach globally, and even if you go out, you’re still under our control.”
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Most Viewed in World
From our partners
Source: Read Full Article
