Meghan Markle: Expert discusses relationship with Nancy Pelosi
We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
The letter, which was purported to have been written and signed by Meghan Markle, reads very much like a speech and was mainly advocating for paid leave for all. The Duchess of Sussex wrote it to the Speaker and Leader of the US House of Representatives, in which she opened with: “I’m not an elected official, and I’m not a politician. I am, like many, an engaged citizen and a parent.”
In the letter, Meghan goes on to discuss the highs and lows of parenting during the coronavirus pandemic.
She spoke about the aftermath of giving birth to Lilibet on June 4, 2021.
Meghan said: In June, my husband and I welcomed our second child.
“Like any parents, we were overjoyed.
“Like many parents, we were overwhelmed.
“Like fewer parents, we weren’t confronted with the harsh reality of either spending those first few critical months with our baby or going back to work.
“We knew we could take her home, and in that vital (and sacred) stage, devote any and everything to our kids and to our family.
“We knew that by doing so we wouldn’t have to make impossible choices about childcare, work, and medical care that so many have to make every single day.”
Meghan signed the letter at the end with her royal title, ‘The Duchess of Sussex’, and included a handwritten signature.
Judi James, a speech analyst, spoke to Express.co.uk about Meghan’s “powerful” letter.
Judi said: “Is Meghan moving into politics? She is very emphatic about denying this here.
“Even beginning her letter with the sentence ‘I’m not an elected official and I’m not a politician’, but denial, is often a factor of political leadership.
“The best politicians aren’t ‘career politicians’ but, as Meghan does seem to describe herself, ‘Engaged citizens and parents’, who are driven by a passionate desire to make change for the better.
“Truly great politicians don’t always choose leadership but have had it thrust on them by people needing a strong voice from someone with influence, and that is exactly where Meghan sounds with her words and sentiments here.
“The letter reads like a very powerful and eloquent speech, and it almost seems a shame we can’t hear her deliver it too, in her own voice and with her own emotions,” Judi said.
“Like all good political speeches, she sets out her objective for change before scoping the narrative out into a section that is often referred to as the ‘This is who I am’ bit during leadership speeches.
“Like Kier Starmer’s speech at this year’s conference, and like many party leader’s speeches before his, there is a large chunk of biographical content aimed at creating a sense of empathy and justification for speaking on behalf of those families they hope to represent.
“Meghan’s emotive back-story here reminds us that, despite the ‘Duchess of Sussex’ title and sign-off, the woman behind the current wealthy lifestyle and royal privilege grew up very differently, i.e. ‘…on the $4.99 salad bar at Sizzler.’
“She tells us she babysat at 13 and worked ‘all my life’ to ‘make ends meet and pay rent and put gas in my car.’
“This establishing of bonds between herself and her current lifestyle and people who live less comfortably is also stressed in her comments on being a ‘mom’.
“‘Like any parents’ and ‘Like many parents’ come with those italics to prove that the empathy is based on reality and shared experiences, so that when she says she is ‘writing on behalf of millions of American families’, the credentials are impeccable to do this.
“When Meghan writes ‘The families you represent need your strong leadership’, the power of her words and the construction and delivery of her points does make her sound like the ideal candidate for that role.”
The royal line of succession – who outranks who?
The line of succession to the British throne dictates the order in which each member of the Royal Family would ascend to the throne.
It is also seen as a ranking of importance with the head of the line, the Queen, taking the place of ruler.
Older children come before younger children. Traditionally boys came before girls, but this law was changed on March 26, 2015 before the birth of Prince William’s first child.
Incredibly, Catholics are still excluded from the line of succession, as are children born outside of wedlock.
The royals, who usually stick to a strict protocol when appearing in public, often arrive at events in ascending order of importance, with the most important royal arriving last.
Prince Charles, 72, is currently first-in-line to the British throne, followed by Prince William, 39, his oldest son.
Source: Read Full Article
