An Aussie dad who was banned by the court from seeing his kids because he likes to wear nappies has had his court appeal rejected.

The Family Court of Australia banned the man, who can't be named for legal reasons, in 2021 after his ex-wife became concerned his kink would negatively affect their children.

The ex-wife told the court she knew of the dad's adult nappy wearing fetish before they separated, however his kink escalated so that he would wear nappies around the house, LadBible reports.

MailOnline reports that the wife became increasingly concerned how the fetish would impact their children, and following their spilt, the couple agreed he could see their children, provided he hid his kink from them.

However, the wife claims that once her ex-husband picked up the children from her place with his nappy partiality exposed, which is when she decided to take legal action.

The dad appealed the ban, which was rejected in April this year.

Justice Hilary Hannan at the Family Court said the dad had not "satisfactorily addressed the issues of risk".

  • Pensioner who refused to bury wife's body for 21 years finally cremates her

Justice Hannan said: "I have great reservations and ultimately do not accept that the father has an authentic willingness or ­capacity to disavow engaging in the behaviours in question and in his connections to the community."

The dad believes he doesn't pose a threat to his children and believes he is being discriminated against because he is part of the Adult Baby-Diaper Lover community.

To stay up to date with all the latest news, make sure you sign up to one of our newsletters here.

  • People left seriously divided over claims 'Mini Cheddars aren't crisps'

In correspondence with the Daily Telegraph, he wrote: "I feel for and have always respected other minority identities who have been persecuted or treated differently just for being who they are.

"What I choose to do in the privacy of my own home without any children present is my business. It is a harmless ­activity and affects no one."

While the ex-wife has called the ruling as "landmark", the father will take his appeal to the High Court of Australia.

Source: Read Full Article